Gettysburg The Turning Point Game Manual

Gettysburg The Turning Point Game Manual

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers. Start Free Trial Cancel anytime. Report this Document Download Now Save Save Gettysburg the Turning Point For Later 75% (4) 75% found this document useful (4 votes) 2K views 36 pages Gettysburg the Turning Point Uploaded by remow Description: Gettysburg the Turning Point computer game manual, SSI Full description Save Save Gettysburg the Turning Point For Later 75% 75% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful 25% 25% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful Embed Share Print Download Now Jump to Page You are on page 1 of 36 Search inside document Browse Books Site Directory Site Language: English Change Language English Change Language. The game uses a refined version of SSI's Antietam game system and is played in 42 turns each representing 1 hour of real time over a 3 day period. Players are awarded points based on casualties and territorial objectives. At the end of each turn and the end of the game points are calculated and compared to a chart which determines your level of victory. The game can be played under 3 different sets of rules (Basic, Intermediate and Advanced) with 5 levels of difficulty for each and can be played against another person or the computer can play either side. Gettysburg: The Turning Point is a classic wargame. If you can get by the CGA graphics and lack of mouse support interface, you will soon find yourself in a very well reproduced simulation of this famous battle from the Civil War. This game uses the game system first seen in SSI's Battle of Antietam, and its Command system accurately reflects the effects of leaders on the battlefield. Invidual soldiers and artillery also have a bearing on the game.

• gettysburg the turning point game manual, gettysburg the turning point game manual, gettysburg the turning point game manual 2, gettysburg the turning point game manual pdf, gettysburg the turning point game manual free, gettysburg the turning point game manual download, gettysburg the turning point game manual.

Of special note: This was the first game that included the degradation of visibility due to the volume of black powder or smoke obscuring the battlefield-- an innovation that became the mainstay of wargaming. How to run this game on modern Windows PC. Contact:, done in 0.003 seconds. Of special note: This was the first game that included the degradation of visibility due to the volume of black powder or smoke obscuring the battlefield-- an innovation that became the mainstay of wargaming. Addictive game. Great for two players or against the brilliant AI. Armies move by Regiment and everything is calculated down to the man and gun. Historic leaders get killed more than the real battle. Perhaps this is because I tend to play a little more reckless than the real guys. Massive three day battle is like a history lesson and wargame at the same time. While the graphics are basic, before long you will feel you are right at the Bloodiest Battle of the Civil War. If you have trouble toIf the manual is missing and you own the original manual, please contact us. Just one click to download at full speed. DOS Version Download 158 KB Developer: Strategic Simulations, Inc. Download 69 KB Developer: Strategic Simulations, Inc. Download 1 MB Developer: Strategic Simulations, Inc. Download 83 KB Win 1997 Tournament Tennis DOS, C64, Amstrad CPC, ColecoVision 1985 Shiloh: Grant's Trial in the West DOS, C64, Apple II 1987 Genghis Khan II: Clan of the Gray Wolf DOS, Genesis, PC-88 1993 Colonial Conquest C64, Atari 8-bit, Atari ST, Apple II, PC-98 1985. Checking your browser before accessing This process is automatic. Your browser will redirect to your requested content shortly. To say that this is problematic is an understatement of considerable magnitude. In World War II, the squad was the basic tactical element of maneuver and fighting (and represented as such by ASL). However, during the American Civil War, it was not the squad, nor the platoon, but really the company.

Though lower levels existed for organizational and some marching and other purposes, it was companies that were really the lowest meaningful tactical unit during the Civil War. Thus any game that attempts to reach down past the company level to some lower level in order to represent the Civil War is fundamentally wrongheaded from the get-go. Though, in its own way, it is a serious attempt to treat tactical Civil War conflict, even in concept it is simply not adequate. You can’t compare apples to oranges, much less, as in this case, try to wrap an orange peel around an apple and label it citrus. Two expansion modules were released at the same time as GTP, both covering additional portions of the Gettysburg battlefield: Devil’s Den and Into the Wheatfield. This also serves as notice that GTP does not cover the entire battle of Gettysburg, but rather only two small slices of it: McPherson’s Ridge and the Bliss Farm. The ATS version was designed by Mark Johnson, an actual historian and retired Army officer who wanted to try to port ATS to the Civil War and designed a set of rules to do so. Ray Tapio published this attempt, with changes. Then, according to Johnson, Tapio himself created an ASL version of GTP without input or assistance from Johnson (though Johnson was also familiar with ASL).For example, one odd quirk of the CWASL rules system is that often leaders are randomly generated. Depending on the scenario, an OB will have all or, more often, most of of a side’s leaders be determined randomly. When leaders are determined randomly, dice are rolled on a Leader Table to choose each leader. The most common result, which occurs on a DR of 7 or 8, is the generation of an 8-0 leader. However, both the Union and Confederate countermixes have a grand total of 1 8-0 unit each. What is done then? The rules do not say, though a chart indicates that a leader of the “next lower value, followed by the next highest,” is chosen. This is likely to happen all the time.

Obviously, at only 8 pages, the rules are superficial at best. In very broad strokes, they try to transport ASL back to the mid-19th century. Leaders, at least, still represent one man and not conjoined twins. Bizarrely, CC firepower factors for MMCs (except crews) are doubled in close combat. Note, however, that close combat is still, like original ASL, odds-based, so doubling firepower factors HAS NO PRACTICAL EFFECT except to make them butt-kickers when used against crews.Though these are squad types that are essentially differentiated by weapon types, they can still Battle Harden; presumably better weapons dropped from the skies. Both sides also have 4-5-8 and 4-2-8 squads that cannot Battle Harden, and the Union has a similar 5-5-8 squad. Presumably these are used for cavalry, although the ranges are peculiar in that they seem to represent either breechloading rifles or swords and pistols, but not carbines. In effect, it is doubled: players can stack up to 6 “squads” and 6 SMC in a hex without penalty. Cavalry, however, remain as in ASL. Players can stack up to 2 guns per hex without penalty. This does not cause as much of a stacking issue as one might think, thanks to the absence of support weapons. Readers should note that with all of these units stacked together in a single hex, GTP cannot easily simulate the linear warfare that actually predominated. Only units with a normal range of 4 or more can have normal long range fire; units with a range of three only get one additional hex of range with LRF, while units with a range of 2 or less don’t get any at all. This is because range is the key differentiation between differently-armed units in GTP. In the opposite of prone, units can also conduct bayonet charges, which are basically human waves. Units do not automatically participate, however, but must pass a TC. Units within C2 range are considered in command.

If Isolated but not Out of Command, they must “close up” at “the first opportunity” and “move towards the nearest Location containing a leader of the same Command,” using CX and moving as a stack. Nearest Location in hexes or in MF. Units in command suffer Casualty Reduction rather than Breaking. Essentially, eligible units may not be excluded from such a platoon. Units may also move with “Column” movement as per E11.5. Rather, multi-hex fire groups place a “point of aim” counter at a target hex and the collective firepower is “distributed” among various targets in a somewhat complicated way. GTP provides for a very limited form of OBA but basically uses direct fire. Gun rules are more or less as they are in ASL, with some differences. Four types of ammunition are available: Solid Shot, Shell, Case Shot, and Canister. Guns can occasionally burst. Certain leaders can modify the fire of Guns. Whatever players will get, it won’t really be Civil War tactical combat. You may remember Longstreet conducting a parachuting banzai into a nest of panjis during the Seven Days. Under less than optimal lighting conditions, there is not a ton of difference between the two shades. A few prominent leaders bear historical names, such as the 10-4 (!) Joshua Chamberlain counter, but for lesser leaders, as well as heroes, Critical Hit did not even bother to come up with different names, so Union and Confederates alike have the same Captain Dixon, the same Captain Cook, the same Corporal Ray, and so forth. How much effort would it have been to type in different names. For the small map, representing the Bliss Farm, this is not a problem, but assembling six map panels for McPherson’s ridge is a pain. The artwork is more or less standard (for Critical Hit) ASL artwork.

A lot of the buildings are clones of each other and the fence depictions are weird, but more so because of the decision to strictly have them adhere to hexsides, which means that fences do not appear in a straight line, but as crazy zigzag fences, an effect made doubly bizarre when two fences appear adjacent to a road like the Chambersburg Pike. The various levels in the maps are all shades of green and may not be sufficiently differentiated to all players’ content. Designers can either seek out tiny, irrelevant actions to portray, skirmishes in the middle of nowhere that had little effect on the overall war, or they can seek out tiny slices of large, important battles and divorce those slices from their context. The latter option is what GTP has chosen, depicting various tiny slices of the Battle of Gettysburg, which was the largest battle waged in the Western Hemisphere. GTP comes with 10 scenarios, 6 for McPherson’s Ridge and 4 for the Bliss Farm. They all seem odd in that the number of units tend to be dwarfed by the map area, especially with the stacking rules, so that the actions seem to be very isolated actions, when in fact there were many other units fighting very nearby. For virtually the same price, one could mosey over to GMT’s website and purchase Three Days of Gettysburg, a massive game on the entire battle, designed by a well-known designer of Civil War games, with counter and map artwork by three of the most respected wargame artists in the business. Unlike GTP, the GMT game was designed from the ground up to simulate Civil War combat and does so well. The choice seems rather obvious. ASL is World War II, not the Civil War. However, there may have also been a falling out with the original artist, which necessitated a re-do of the artwork so that new modules would have artwork compatible with the old. In any case, the new artwork is, overall, better than the original artwork. Ostensibly the play aid was also revised.

Alas, I let my deep love of the ACW cloud my judgment. Your thoughtful and thorough review exposes just how overwhelmingly wrong the entire endeavor is. If you really love small unit actions, it is worth it. CH has been advertising a new Civil War series for about three years now, but I haven’t heard anything about it. Probably isn’t even available yet. Published by Strategic Simulations, Inc. From Mobygames.com. Original Entry Be the first one to. These names were part of the most infamous battle fought on our own soil: the Battle of Gettysburg. Now, on the heels of the critically acclaimed Battle of Antietam, Strategic Simulations has released yet another outstanding computer war game, Gettysburg: The Turning Point. Gettysburg: The Turning Point was designed by Chuck Kroegel and programmed by David Landrey; and if the game bears more than a passing resemblance to its illustrious predecessor Antietam, it's no coincidence. The same two talented individuals created Antietam. Combine the aforementioned with such factors as fatigue, routs, the effects of superior and inferior command, the effects of elevation, realistic terrain, and so forth, and you have a winner. There are three difficulty levels, and optional hidden units, icons or symbols, variable orders of appearance (which can alter the historical accuracy of the game), and optional cavalry reinforcements. Gettysburg retains that feature by its very structure. The simulation, like the actual battle, begins with a skirmish between the Confederate forces of Heth and the Union forces of Buford. Game turn by game turn, more and more troops appear on the screen, awaiting combat orders. Like a small fire feeding first on twigs and finally turning into a blaze, the game grows into the major conflict it simulates, a conflict that eventually involved over 160,000 troops and decided, during the course of three days, the fate of a nation.

However, the system used in the earlier game has been even further refined to insure greater accuracy and playability. While the changes are numerous, some of the more significant ones include ammunition points; more realistic fatigue rules; an End-of-the-Day Phase that provides an accurate score at that point in the game; clearer cursor plotting in the combat phase (with the cursor first appearing over the firing unit and then appearing over the target unit when casualties are inflicted); artillery units containing both men and guns; no activation limits; and much greater emphasis on and flexibility in Command control, Commanders can be shifted from one Brigade, Division, or Corps to another as the player desires. An Atari ST version was announced but not released.Archived from the original on 2012-12-16. December 1987. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. v t e By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. These games emphasize accessibilityThe economic, political, religious and social aspects of warfare are examined in concert with events on the battlefield.Vicksburg was the key.The longer Vicksburg stood, the more would farmers and businesses in half the country be hurt by the war. He crossed a river, marched without supply lines and won five battles, captured and sacked a state capital, and then lay siege and captured one of the best-defended spots on earth. Can you, commanding the theater forces for the Confederacy gather your scattered troops and disjointed commands and create a force strong enough to launch powerful attacks. Can you punish Grant for his audacity. Can you make it appear that Pemberton and Johnston are fighting for the same side? Can you put that key in your pocket or deny it to the enemy? He has been a teacher for Teacher Corps, taught 7th and 8th grade history, served as a librarian, professor of education at YSU, as well as game designer and author.

He’s also served as developer of several gamesPaul earned Bachelor and Masters degrees in history, as well as Master degrees in education and library science from YSU and KSU. He’s also been awarded two Charles S. Roberts Awards forIn 2011 Paul debuted as a game publisher with his line High Flying Dice Games. Check out Junior Scholastic At Home for our favorite stories and tools to kick off your year. Ask: What do you think this play will be about. Who do you think is the protagonist and why? Encourage students to use their voices, facial expressions, and posture to convey their characters’ thoughts and emotions. What does that contribute to your understanding of the historical events portrayed. CITING TEXTUAL EVIDENCE: What problem or crisis arises for the play’s main character. How does he or she deal with it. What does that character’s personal struggle add to your understanding of the broader historical event the play is about. What main point or conclusion does it cite. Then look back through the play. What actions or turning points in the play contributed to that conclusion. MAKING INFERENCES: How does the present-day person or event described in the play’s sidebar relate to what happened in the play. Why do you think the editors chose to pair these past and present stories. CITING TEXTUAL EVIDENCE: Which character in the play, if any, could be described as a hero or a villain. Cite evidence in the text to support your answer. INTEGRATING VISUALS: What do the photos, map, and illustrations add to your understanding of the play’s characters and events. Would they be as effective without the captions? Explain. COMPARING PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SOURCES: How do the excerpts from primary sources (Cormany’s diary, Pickett’s letter) compare with the main body of the play, which is a secondary source. Is one any more effective than the other. DESCRIPTIVE WRITING: Imagine that you’ve just fought at Gettysburg.

Write a letter or diary entry describing how it feels to be on either the winning or the losing side. MAPPING IT OUT: Use the interactive “Decisive Moments in the Battle of Gettysburg” map and timeline at to go into more detail on events in the play. DRAWING CONCLUSIONS: What is the central message of the play. How is that message revealed. Ask: How does historical information presented in a play differ from what’s in history books.Encourage them to design a set, scenery, props, and costumes to enhance their show. After the performance, let audience members ask the cast about the people and incidents portrayed. 8. ANALYZE NARRATIVE NONFICTION GENRES Remind students that, although the dialogue in the play is imagined, most of the people in the play were real, as were the situations described. Ask: How does historical information presented in a play differ from what’s in history books.Higher Level Have students imagine they are one of the characters in the play, then ask them to write a diary or blog entry describing a challenge or crisis that character faced and how he or she overcame it. Please try again.Please try again.Register a free business account Please try your search again later.The game uses a refined version of SSI's Antietam game system and is played in 42 turns each representing 1 hour of real time over a 3 day period. The game can be played under 3 different sets of rules (Basic, Intermediate and Advanced) with 5 levels of difficulty for each and can be played against another person or the computer can play either side.Savings represents a discount off the List Price.To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness. Strictly necessary and functional cookies support login and shopping cart features, they cannot be disabled.

Performance cookies support site performance analysis. These are optional and will be disbaled if you click on Reject. Scourge of War captures the tactical challenges that faced the real Union and Confederate commanders more than 130 years ago. With impressive 3D graphics, an award-winning AI, pausable real-time play, historical battlefield terrain and orders of battle down to the regiment and battery level, Scourge of War captures the tactical challenges that faced the real Union and Confederate commanders more than 130 years ago. Every engagement at Gettysburg has been meticulously researched and recreated, along with multiple “what if” scenarios to keep players on their toes. Featuring incredibly detailed battlefields created from four high-resolution maps with authentic and historic weather and battles, players will be able to experience history right on their computers. See if your strategy can hand Lee the victory that was pulled from his grasp. Can you as Longstreet take out the Union left flank. Or will you stand as Chamberlain on Little Round Top and order “FIX BAYONETS!” Do you have what it takes to prove that Pickett's Charge could have resulted in anything besides the mass slaughter of Longstreet's Corps. Can you do better than history or have all the great Generals passed away with that bygone era? It was also the battle with the largest number of casualties during the war. Lee looked to invade the North through Pennsylvania, to Harrisburg or as far as Philadelphia. With this offensive, Lee hoped to not only take pressure off war-ravaged Virginia but to also influence the North towards suing for peace. Heading towards Gettysburg, Lee was set to find and destroy the Union Army of the Potomac commanded by the newly-appointed General George Meade. Lead elements of these armies encountered each other on July 1, 1863, and both forces rushed to gain the most advantageous ground.

The Confederate Army assembled opposite them across open fields and wooded terrain. Fierce fighting took place in close-quarters on the Union’s left flank at Devil’s Den, the Wheatfield, and the Peach Orchard, with the Union soldiers hard-pressed and just able to hold the line. Terrible casualties were incurred by both sides. Known as the “high water mark” of the Confederacy, Pickett’s Charge ended up being repulsed by Union cannon and rifle fire with incredible losses. By the end of the day, both sides had sustained nearly 51,000 losses, with the Army of the Virginia on the retreat. Victory at Gettysburg along with the surrender of Vicksburg to the Union Army under General Grant on July 4, meant that the South suffered two setbacks that would turn the tide of war against them. Scourge of War: Gettysburg, Slitherine Ltd.All other marks and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. You can use this link to download the game directly to your computer over the internet and start playing right away. The download is available to you for thirty days after your order. No shipping is involved and the game is immediately available for you once the order is complete. Then have a boxed copy of the game shipped to you as a backup for permanent storage. With a backup, you'll be prepared for whatever comes your way-whether it's a system crash, a computer virus damaging your files or the software simply no longer functioning as it should. You will be billed to have the game shipped in a printed DVD box with a printed DVD and your serial number. For a physical order you will also need to supply a shipping address. The recipient will receive an email with instructions, the serial number and how to register and download the game and redeem a Steam key if available. Also includes a PDF E-Book indexed manual.

As is suggested elsewhere on these pages, that view is not universally held, mostly because of the fact that the North and South had two very different objectives in war: the Union had to decisively defeat the South in order to bring them back into the fold; the Confederacy, on the other hand, could have won its objective of independence with a draw; in other words, what the South had to do was to keep the North from winning. One might well add a fourth, namely, the Emancipation Proclamation, because it redefined the goals of the war for both North and South. A fifth turning point was Sherman's march through Georgia—a turning point only in the sense that there could be no turning back from that point forward—for either side. But the meaning of the battle for the course of the war was rooted in two events that occurred off the battlefield. First, in order for the South to have a significantly improved chance of winning the war, it needed foreign assistance. Just as the struggling 13 colonies, after they had declared themselves states, needed the assistance of the French to stave off defeat at the hands of the mighty British Empire, the Confederacy would certainly have benefited from the intrusion of Great Britain into the war. Had Great Britain intervened on the side of the Confederacy, it is quite likely that the Confederate States of America would have become a permanent political entity. In the opening days of the conflict the Union had suffered a diplomatic humiliation over the Trent affair, when Confederate agents were arrested while aboard a British ship, H.M.S. Trent. President Lincoln eventually apologized to the British, and the affair died, but about the same time Secretary of State William Seward had suggested that the president might want to provoke Great Britain and perhaps France into a conflict in order to reunify the country, an idea which wise Lincoln wisely ignored.

The British were quite dependent upon Southern cotton to supply their mills, and there were other factors that supported friendly relationships between Great Britain and the confederacy. Thus, recognition and intervention on the part of Great Britain was no far-fetched idea. Nevertheless, as the early lack of Union success on the battlefields, especially in the East, opened the possibility of an eventual Confederate victory, Great Britain began to move in the direction of recognition of the South and perhaps a further involvement in the war on the Confederate side. But they needed a strong sign. In 1862 the British were looking for a similar sign of encouragement, and when Lee invaded Maryland's in September 1862, British leaders began to believe that a victory on Union soil might be what they were looking for. But although Lee's intrepid Army of Northern Virginia held its own against the larger Union force, largely because General McClellan failed to exploit his advantages, Lee was forced to retreat, and the tactical draw certainly did not equate to a strategic victory. The British hesitated, Lincoln acted, and the moment for recognition quickly passed. When Horace Greeley challenged him in an open letter to state his intentions regarding slavery in the summer of 1862, Lincoln responded by saying that if he thought he could save the Union by freeing all the slaves, he would do so. He added that if he thought he could save the Union by freeing none of the slaves he would do that, and then added that if he felt he could save the Union by freeing some of the slaves and leaving others in bondage, that he would do as well. In the end that is what he did. He decided to issue an Emancipation Proclamation, but he did not want to do so when Union military fortunes looked bleak, lest it seem like a desperation move. Although Antietam was not a decisive victory, it was close enough for Lincoln to use, since Lee had to retreat into Virginia.

Thus President Lincoln issued his Emancipation Proclamation five days after the battle of Antietam, announcing that as of January 1, 1863, slaves in territory controlled by the Confederacy were to be forever free. He did not free all the slaves because he felt the did not have the constitutional authority to do so. Instead he used the Confederacy's own position regarding slaves against them: he counted them as property, property that had value in time of war and was therefore subject to being confiscated as contraband. Second, the battle was costly, the bloodiest single day of fighting in all of American history, and while the losses were approximately equal, the North could tolerate them far better than the Confederacy because it had a much larger manpower pool on which to draw. In that sense Antietam was militarily significant, if not a turning point in the military sense. Lincoln's first concern was to save the Union; and although,Lincoln abhorred slavery, ending the “peculiar institution” was secondary to him. (Those who believe that Lincoln cared more about saving the Union than about ending slavery miss the point: If the Confederacy had won the war and become independent, Lincoln could have done nothing about the status of slavery in North America. And it is clear from the Confederate Constitution and the prewar political rhetoric, not to mention feelings and attitudes that had evolved in the South over 200 years, that slavery would have continued for a long time after the end of the conflict, perhaps even into the 20th century.) So from merely saving Union, the goal for the North became to save the Union without the institution of slavery. It is interesting to note that by the end of the war in late 1864-early 1865, the Confederacy had apparently changed its goal in the war as well, which had been to preserve Southern society with slavery intact. Instead their goal became to gain independence, even if they had to give up slavery in order to get it.